How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sweden?

51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Sweden: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP

Cuba

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2020

Sweden

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Cuba rank

106th

Sweden rank

107th

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time

Cuba
Sweden

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Sweden, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 106th and Sweden ranks 107th of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0008 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
1980s	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
1990s	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2000s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2010s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Cuba
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Cuba or Sweden?: Cuba, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Sweden as of 2020.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Cuba and Sweden?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sweden?: 51 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2020.
How do Cuba and Sweden rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?: Cuba ranks 106th and Sweden ranks 107th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Sweden: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/sweden/">Cuba vs Sweden: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 171 places, 9,202 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.