Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Losses from manure treated

Melanesia
12.69 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
13.36 million kg
in 2023
Melanesia rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
8th

All Animals — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 13.36 million kg against 12.69 million kg in Melanesia, a difference of 670,800 kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times Melanesia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Melanesia ahead.

Melanesia ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 20 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 6 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 4.66 million kg 2.84 million kg 1.81 million kg Melanesia
1970s 6.08 million kg 3.48 million kg 2.60 million kg Melanesia
1980s 7.17 million kg 4.28 million kg 2.89 million kg Melanesia
1990s 9.36 million kg 5.04 million kg 4.33 million kg Melanesia
2000s 11.74 million kg 7.20 million kg 4.54 million kg Melanesia
2010s 12.43 million kg 9.83 million kg 2.60 million kg Melanesia
2020s 12.39 million kg 12.70 million kg 318,175 kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 13.36 million kg against 12.69 million kg in Melanesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
670,800 kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated?
Melanesia ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 8th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).