Montenegro vs Zambia: All Animals — Losses from manure treated
All Animals — Losses from manure treated over time
- Montenegro
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 2.12 million kg against 1.88 million kg in Montenegro, a difference of 242,090 kg.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 109th and Zambia ranks 105th of 195 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.80 million kg | 1.17 million kg | 1.63 million kg | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 2.32 million kg | 1.82 million kg | 499,760 kg | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 1.92 million kg | 2.04 million kg | 113,870 kg | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated, Montenegro or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 2.12 million kg against 1.88 million kg in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated between Montenegro and Zambia?
- 242,090 kg, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Zambia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Zambia rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated?
- Montenegro ranks 109th and Zambia ranks 105th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).