Morocco vs Zimbabwe: All Animals β€” Losses from manure treated

Morocco
1.83 million kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2.02 million kg
in 2023
Morocco rank
120th
Zimbabwe rank
118th

All Animals β€” Losses from manure treated over time

  • Morocco
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2.02 million kg against 1.83 million kg in Morocco, a difference of 191,970 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Morocco ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 211 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Morocco Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.19 million kg 1.23 million kg 39,577 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 1.39 million kg 1.84 million kg 451,023 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 1.63 million kg 1.84 million kg 208,584 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 1.68 million kg 1.85 million kg 169,311 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 1.63 million kg 1.81 million kg 188,569 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 1.93 million kg 1.88 million kg 53,733 kg Morocco
2020s 1.96 million kg 1.91 million kg 58,545 kg Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals β€” losses from manure treated, Morocco or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2.02 million kg against 1.83 million kg in Morocco as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals β€” losses from manure treated between Morocco and Zimbabwe?
191,970 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Morocco and Zimbabwe rank globally for all animals β€” losses from manure treated?
Morocco ranks 120th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals β€” Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Morocco vs Zimbabwe: All Animals β€” Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/morocco/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/morocco/zimbabwe/">Morocco vs Zimbabwe: All Animals β€” Losses from manure treated</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals β€” Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).