Panama vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Losses from manure treated

Panama
2.03 million kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
2.02 million kg
in 2023
Panama rank
117th
Zimbabwe rank
118th

All Animals — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Panama
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 2.03 million kg against 2.02 million kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 6,390 kg.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Panama ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 211 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 961,068 kg 1.23 million kg 264,250 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 1.04 million kg 1.84 million kg 805,657 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 1.28 million kg 1.84 million kg 563,670 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 1.58 million kg 1.85 million kg 270,564 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 1.94 million kg 1.81 million kg 122,080 kg Panama
2010s 2.08 million kg 1.88 million kg 202,808 kg Panama
2020s 2.00 million kg 1.91 million kg 90,195 kg Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated, Panama or Zimbabwe?
Panama, at 2.03 million kg against 2.02 million kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated between Panama and Zimbabwe?
6,390 kg, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Zimbabwe rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated?
Panama ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/panama/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/panama/zimbabwe/">Panama vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).