Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: All Animals — Losses from manure treated

Sub-Saharan Africa
146.73 million kg
in 2023
Uzbekistan
146.15 million kg
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
24th
Uzbekistan rank
14th

All Animals — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Uzbekistan
25.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 146.73 million kg against 146.15 million kg in Uzbekistan, a difference of 580,000 kg.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 24th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 33 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 66.25 million kg 55.56 million kg 10.68 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 83.00 million kg 66.43 million kg 16.57 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 121.00 million kg 111.94 million kg 9.06 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 142.29 million kg 140.87 million kg 1.42 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — losses from manure treated, Sub-Saharan Africa or Uzbekistan?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 146.73 million kg against 146.15 million kg in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — losses from manure treated between Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?
580,000 kg, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for all animals — losses from manure treated?
Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 24th and Uzbekistan ranks 14th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: All Animals — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/sub-saharan-africa/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/sub-saharan-africa/uzbekistan/">Sub-Saharan Africa vs Uzbekistan: All Animals — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).