How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Zambia: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita

Mauritius

1.22 kg per person

in 2023

Zambia

1.27 kg per person

in 2023

Mauritius rank

134th

Zambia rank

132nd

All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita over time

Mauritius
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.27 kg per person against 1.22 kg per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0.05 kg per person.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 134th and Zambia ranks 132nd of 170 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.2533 kg per person	0.8421 kg per person	0.5888 kg per person	Zambia
1970s	0.2643 kg per person	1.11 kg per person	0.8478 kg per person	Zambia
1980s	0.3902 kg per person	1.04 kg per person	0.6458 kg per person	Zambia
1990s	0.6408 kg per person	1.05 kg per person	0.4099 kg per person	Zambia
2000s	0.8296 kg per person	1 kg per person	0.1714 kg per person	Zambia
2010s	1.1 kg per person	1.43 kg per person	0.3352 kg per person	Zambia
2020s	1.2 kg per person	1.29 kg per person	0.0864 kg per person	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita, Mauritius or Zambia?: Zambia, at 1.27 kg per person against 1.22 kg per person in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita between Mauritius and Zambia?: 0.05 kg per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per capita?: Mauritius ranks 134th and Zambia ranks 132nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zambia: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/mauritius/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-capita/mauritius/zambia/">Mauritius vs Zambia: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per capita
Unit: kg per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.