Central African Republic vs Iceland: All Animals: Manure applied to soils (N) … Animals square kilometre

Central African Republic
35.44 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
39.86 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
147th
Iceland rank
144th

All Animals: Manure applied to soils (N) … Animals square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Iceland
01020304050196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 39.86 kg per square kilometre against 35.44 kg per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 4.42 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 147th and Iceland ranks 144th of 170 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 2.29 kg per square kilometre 42.49 kg per square kilometre 40.2 kg per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 5.03 kg per square kilometre 44.74 kg per square kilometre 39.72 kg per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 11.8 kg per square kilometre 45.3 kg per square kilometre 33.49 kg per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 18.07 kg per square kilometre 43.29 kg per square kilometre 25.22 kg per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 26.3 kg per square kilometre 39.76 kg per square kilometre 13.46 kg per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 34.03 kg per square kilometre 41.14 kg per square kilometre 7.11 kg per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 35.22 kg per square kilometre 39.95 kg per square kilometre 4.73 kg per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square, Central African Republic or Iceland?
Iceland, at 39.86 kg per square kilometre against 35.44 kg per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square between Central African Republic and Iceland?
4.42 kg per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Iceland rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square?
Central African Republic ranks 147th and Iceland ranks 144th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Iceland: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/">Central African Republic vs Iceland: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.