How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Sweden: All Animals: Manure applied to soils (N) … Animals square kilometre

Chile

131.63 kg per square kilometre

in 2023

Sweden

135.45 kg per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

105th

Sweden rank

103rd

All Animals: Manure applied to soils (N) … Animals square kilometre over time

Chile
Sweden

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 135.45 kg per square kilometre against 131.63 kg per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 3.82 kg per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 105th and Sweden ranks 103rd of 170 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Sweden	Difference	Ahead
1960s	48.89 kg per square kilometre	269.03 kg per square kilometre	220.14 kg per square kilometre	Sweden
1970s	59.72 kg per square kilometre	233.81 kg per square kilometre	174.09 kg per square kilometre	Sweden
1980s	63.31 kg per square kilometre	227.38 kg per square kilometre	164.07 kg per square kilometre	Sweden
1990s	106.72 kg per square kilometre	209.24 kg per square kilometre	102.52 kg per square kilometre	Sweden
2000s	131.21 kg per square kilometre	188.93 kg per square kilometre	57.72 kg per square kilometre	Sweden
2010s	133.68 kg per square kilometre	177.99 kg per square kilometre	44.31 kg per square kilometre	Sweden
2020s	133.39 kg per square kilometre	138.21 kg per square kilometre	4.82 kg per square kilometre	Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square, Chile or Sweden?: Sweden, at 135.45 kg per square kilometre against 131.63 kg per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square between Chile and Sweden?: 3.82 kg per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sweden rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square?: Chile ranks 105th and Sweden ranks 103rd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sweden: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/">Chile vs Sweden: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit: kg per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.