Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals: Manure applied to soils (N) … Animals square kilometre

Guatemala
737.55 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
678.79 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
38th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
39th

All Animals: Manure applied to soils (N) … Animals square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 737.55 kg per square kilometre against 678.79 kg per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 58.76 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 39th of 170 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 180.11 kg per square kilometre 79.15 kg per square kilometre 100.97 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 228.1 kg per square kilometre 64.81 kg per square kilometre 163.29 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 235.28 kg per square kilometre 53.27 kg per square kilometre 182.01 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 342.09 kg per square kilometre 63.37 kg per square kilometre 278.72 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 578.55 kg per square kilometre 215.41 kg per square kilometre 363.14 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 682.31 kg per square kilometre 530.65 kg per square kilometre 151.66 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 733.08 kg per square kilometre 643.41 kg per square kilometre 89.67 kg per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square, Guatemala or Sao Tome and Principe?
Guatemala, at 737.55 kg per square kilometre against 678.79 kg per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square between Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
58.76 kg per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square?
Guatemala ranks 38th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 39th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/sao-tome-and-principe/">Guatemala vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.