Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: All Animals: Manure applied to soils (N) … Animals square kilometre

Mozambique
27.27 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Solomon Islands
18.37 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
156th
Solomon Islands rank
159th

All Animals: Manure applied to soils (N) … Animals square kilometre over time

  • Mozambique
  • Solomon Islands
1020304050196119922023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 27.27 kg per square kilometre against 18.37 kg per square kilometre in Solomon Islands, a difference of 8.9 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.5 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Mozambique ranks 156th and Solomon Islands ranks 159th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 5 and Solomon Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 6.15 kg per square kilometre 7.76 kg per square kilometre 1.62 kg per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1970s 8.78 kg per square kilometre 13.18 kg per square kilometre 4.4 kg per square kilometre Solomon Islands
1980s 15.95 kg per square kilometre 15.63 kg per square kilometre 0.3249 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 29.64 kg per square kilometre 16.19 kg per square kilometre 13.45 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
2000s 32.78 kg per square kilometre 17.43 kg per square kilometre 15.36 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
2010s 33.49 kg per square kilometre 18.16 kg per square kilometre 15.33 kg per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 37.42 kg per square kilometre 18.33 kg per square kilometre 19.09 kg per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square, Mozambique or Solomon Islands?
Mozambique, at 27.27 kg per square kilometre against 18.37 kg per square kilometre in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square between Mozambique and Solomon Islands?
8.9 kg per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Solomon Islands rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils (n content), per square?
Mozambique ranks 156th and Solomon Islands ranks 159th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/solomon-islands/">Mozambique vs Solomon Islands: All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.