Barbados vs Eswatini: All Animals — Manure applied to soils

Barbados
1.68 million kg
in 2023
Eswatini
1.83 million kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
169th
Eswatini rank
168th

All Animals — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Barbados
  • Eswatini
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.83 million kg against 1.68 million kg in Barbados, a difference of 155,320 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 169th and Eswatini ranks 168th of 211 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 586,205 kg 1.13 million kg 540,874 kg Eswatini
1970s 891,287 kg 1.34 million kg 452,855 kg Eswatini
1980s 1.28 million kg 1.50 million kg 228,457 kg Eswatini
1990s 1.28 million kg 1.66 million kg 387,395 kg Eswatini
2000s 1.22 million kg 1.70 million kg 481,741 kg Eswatini
2010s 1.46 million kg 1.80 million kg 342,459 kg Eswatini
2020s 1.66 million kg 1.88 million kg 225,560 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils, Barbados or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 1.83 million kg against 1.68 million kg in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils between Barbados and Eswatini?
155,320 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Eswatini rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils?
Barbados ranks 169th and Eswatini ranks 168th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Eswatini: All Animals — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/barbados/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/barbados/eswatini/">Barbados vs Eswatini: All Animals — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).