Israel vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: All Animals — Manure applied to soils

Israel
10.43 million kg
in 2023
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
9.70 million kg
in 2023
Israel rank
123rd
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
125th

All Animals — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Israel
  • Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
2.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M12.0M196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 10.43 million kg against 9.70 million kg in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 729,830 kg.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania, Islamic Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ahead.

Israel ranks 123rd and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 125th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Israel Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 3.09 million kg 5.05 million kg 1.96 million kg Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
1970s 5.77 million kg 4.41 million kg 1.37 million kg Israel
1980s 8.17 million kg 4.75 million kg 3.41 million kg Israel
1990s 7.59 million kg 5.90 million kg 1.69 million kg Israel
2000s 9.57 million kg 7.71 million kg 1.86 million kg Israel
2010s 10.63 million kg 8.85 million kg 1.78 million kg Israel
2020s 10.72 million kg 9.62 million kg 1.10 million kg Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils, Israel or Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
Israel, at 10.43 million kg against 9.70 million kg in Mauritania, Islamic Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils between Israel and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
729,830 kg, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Israel and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils?
Israel ranks 123rd and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 125th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Israel vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: All Animals — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/israel/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/israel/mauritania/">Israel vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: All Animals — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).