New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: All Animals: Manure applied … applied square kilometre leaches

New Caledonia
11.81 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
13.42 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
145th
Zimbabwe rank
142nd

All Animals: Manure applied … applied square kilometre leaches over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
051015196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 13.42 kg per square kilometre against 11.81 kg per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.61 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 8.94 kg per square kilometre 6.47 kg per square kilometre 2.48 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 9.75 kg per square kilometre 9.6 kg per square kilometre 0.1523 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 11.46 kg per square kilometre 9.63 kg per square kilometre 1.83 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 11.32 kg per square kilometre 10.73 kg per square kilometre 0.589 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 12.01 kg per square kilometre 11.33 kg per square kilometre 0.6775 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 11.82 kg per square kilometre 11.9 kg per square kilometre 0.0864 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 11.93 kg per square kilometre 12.56 kg per square kilometre 0.6284 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content), per, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 13.42 kg per square kilometre against 11.81 kg per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content), per between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
1.61 kg per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content), per?
New Caledonia ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.