How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and New Caledonia?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bhutan vs New Caledonia: All Animals: Manure applied to soils … applied capita volatilises

Bhutan

0.487 kg per person

in 2023

New Caledonia

0.4966 kg per person

in 2023

Bhutan rank

90th

New Caledonia rank

89th

All Animals: Manure applied to soils … applied capita volatilises over time

Bhutan
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.4966 kg per person against 0.487 kg per person in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0096 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Bhutan ranks 90th and New Caledonia ranks 89th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bhutan	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.9794 kg per person	1.17 kg per person	0.1889 kg per person	New Caledonia
1970s	0.8796 kg per person	0.9112 kg per person	0.0316 kg per person	New Caledonia
1980s	0.8354 kg per person	0.8726 kg per person	0.0371 kg per person	New Caledonia
1990s	0.6336 kg per person	0.7022 kg per person	0.0687 kg per person	New Caledonia
2000s	0.5357 kg per person	0.6065 kg per person	0.0708 kg per person	New Caledonia
2010s	0.5532 kg per person	0.5193 kg per person	0.0339 kg per person	Bhutan
2020s	0.5487 kg per person	0.5074 kg per person	0.0414 kg per person	Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), Bhutan or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0.4966 kg per person against 0.487 kg per person in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content) between Bhutan and New Caledonia?: 0.0096 kg per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and New Caledonia?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and New Caledonia rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content)?: Bhutan ranks 90th and New Caledonia ranks 89th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs New Caledonia: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/bhutan/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/bhutan/new-caledonia/">Bhutan vs New Caledonia: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita
Unit: kg per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.