How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs Zambia: All Animals: Manure applied to soils … applied capita volatilises

Mauritius

0.2445 kg per person

in 2023

Zambia

0.2534 kg per person

in 2023

Mauritius rank

134th

Zambia rank

132nd

All Animals: Manure applied to soils … applied capita volatilises over time

Mauritius
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.2534 kg per person against 0.2445 kg per person in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0089 kg per person.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 134th and Zambia ranks 132nd of 170 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0507 kg per person	0.1684 kg per person	0.1178 kg per person	Zambia
1970s	0.0529 kg per person	0.2224 kg per person	0.1696 kg per person	Zambia
1980s	0.078 kg per person	0.2072 kg per person	0.1292 kg per person	Zambia
1990s	0.1282 kg per person	0.2101 kg per person	0.082 kg per person	Zambia
2000s	0.1659 kg per person	0.2002 kg per person	0.0343 kg per person	Zambia
2010s	0.2195 kg per person	0.2866 kg per person	0.067 kg per person	Zambia
2020s	0.2401 kg per person	0.2574 kg per person	0.0173 kg per person	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), Mauritius or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0.2534 kg per person against 0.2445 kg per person in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content) between Mauritius and Zambia?: 0.0089 kg per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content)?: Mauritius ranks 134th and Zambia ranks 132nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zambia: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/mauritius/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/mauritius/zambia/">Mauritius vs Zambia: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita
Unit: kg per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.