New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: All Animals: Manure applied … applied square kilometre volatilises

New Caledonia
7.88 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8.94 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
145th
Zimbabwe rank
142nd

All Animals: Manure applied … applied square kilometre volatilises over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8.94 kg per square kilometre against 7.88 kg per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 1.06 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 5.96 kg per square kilometre 4.31 kg per square kilometre 1.65 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 6.5 kg per square kilometre 6.4 kg per square kilometre 0.1015 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 7.64 kg per square kilometre 6.42 kg per square kilometre 1.22 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 7.55 kg per square kilometre 7.15 kg per square kilometre 0.3926 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
2000s 8 kg per square kilometre 7.55 kg per square kilometre 0.4516 kg per square kilometre New Caledonia
2010s 7.88 kg per square kilometre 7.94 kg per square kilometre 0.0576 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 7.95 kg per square kilometre 8.37 kg per square kilometre 0.4189 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8.94 kg per square kilometre against 7.88 kg per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content) between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
1.06 kg per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content)?
New Caledonia ranks 145th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.