How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Eswatini?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Denmark vs Eswatini: All Animals: Manure applied to soils … applied unit GDP volatilises

Denmark

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Eswatini

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Denmark rank

86th

Eswatini rank

83rd

All Animals: Manure applied to soils … applied unit GDP volatilises over time

Denmark
Eswatini

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Denmark, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 86th and Eswatini ranks 83rd of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 4 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Denmark	Eswatini	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0039 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0036 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	Denmark
1970s	0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0012 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
1980s	0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
1990s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2000s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Denmark
2010s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Denmark
2020s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), Denmark or Eswatini?: Eswatini, at 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content) between Denmark and Eswatini?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Eswatini?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Eswatini rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content)?: Denmark ranks 86th and Eswatini ranks 83rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Eswatini: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/denmark/eswatini/">Denmark vs Eswatini: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 171 places, 9,202 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 05 October 2026

All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.