Botswana vs Mauritius: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Botswana
260,394 kg
in 2023
Mauritius
305,353 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
160th
Mauritius rank
158th

All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Mauritius
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 305,353 kg against 260,394 kg in Botswana, a difference of 44,959 kg.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 160th and Mauritius ranks 158th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 6 and Mauritius in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 412,032 kg 37,856 kg 374,177 kg Botswana
1970s 611,784 kg 46,952 kg 564,831 kg Botswana
1980s 724,537 kg 79,326 kg 645,210 kg Botswana
1990s 543,059 kg 143,266 kg 399,792 kg Botswana
2000s 491,772 kg 203,024 kg 288,748 kg Botswana
2010s 380,855 kg 276,654 kg 104,201 kg Botswana
2020s 260,476 kg 302,698 kg 42,222 kg Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Botswana or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 305,353 kg against 260,394 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Botswana and Mauritius?
44,959 kg, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Mauritius rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 160th and Mauritius ranks 158th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mauritius: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/mauritius/">Botswana vs Mauritius: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).