Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Papua New Guinea
3.09 million kg
in 2023
Sri Lanka
2.55 million kg
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
117th
Sri Lanka rank
119th

All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Sri Lanka
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 3.09 million kg against 2.55 million kg in Sri Lanka, a difference of 548,460 kg.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 893,562 kg 3.22 million kg 2.33 million kg Sri Lanka
1970s 1.13 million kg 3.08 million kg 1.94 million kg Sri Lanka
1980s 1.41 million kg 3.47 million kg 2.06 million kg Sri Lanka
1990s 1.94 million kg 3.09 million kg 1.15 million kg Sri Lanka
2000s 2.60 million kg 2.20 million kg 397,372 kg Papua New Guinea
2010s 2.92 million kg 2.53 million kg 383,060 kg Papua New Guinea
2020s 3.04 million kg 2.73 million kg 307,748 kg Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Papua New Guinea or Sri Lanka?
Papua New Guinea, at 3.09 million kg against 2.55 million kg in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka?
548,460 kg, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Sri Lanka rank globally for all animals — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Papua New Guinea ranks 117th and Sri Lanka ranks 119th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/papua-new-guinea/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/papua-new-guinea/sri-lanka/">Papua New Guinea vs Sri Lanka: All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).