Guatemala vs Trinidad and Tobago: All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre

Guatemala
1,673 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
1,646 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
43rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
45th

All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Trinidad and Tobago
5007501.0k1.2k1.5k1.8k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 1,673 kg per square kilometre against 1,646 kg per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 27 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Guatemala ranks 43rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 45th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 615.64 kg per square kilometre 705.31 kg per square kilometre 89.67 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 668.2 kg per square kilometre 973.08 kg per square kilometre 304.88 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 832.41 kg per square kilometre 1,019 kg per square kilometre 186.54 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 946.15 kg per square kilometre 915.67 kg per square kilometre 30.48 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 1,107 kg per square kilometre 1,259 kg per square kilometre 152.69 kg per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 1,456 kg per square kilometre 1,445 kg per square kilometre 10.93 kg per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 1,643 kg per square kilometre 1,620 kg per square kilometre 22.4 kg per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure left on pasture (n content), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Trinidad and Tobago?
Guatemala, at 1,673 kg per square kilometre against 1,646 kg per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure left on pasture (n content), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Trinidad and Tobago?
27 kg per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for all animals — manure left on pasture (n content), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 43rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 45th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Trinidad and Tobago: All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/trinidad-and-tobago/">Guatemala vs Trinidad and Tobago: All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.