China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: All Animals — Manure left on pasture

China, Hong Kong SAR
873,791 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
1.00 million kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
175th
Equatorial Guinea rank
173rd

All Animals — Manure left on pasture over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Equatorial Guinea
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.00 million kg against 873,791 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 130,749 kg.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 175th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Equatorial Guinea in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 884,334 kg 557,099 kg 327,235 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 1.31 million kg 674,455 kg 638,782 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 1.44 million kg 768,987 kg 668,883 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 842,376 kg 849,227 kg 6,851 kg Equatorial Guinea
2000s 373,090 kg 905,637 kg 532,547 kg Equatorial Guinea
2010s 640,835 kg 962,983 kg 322,147 kg Equatorial Guinea
2020s 873,836 kg 998,089 kg 124,253 kg Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure left on pasture, China, Hong Kong SAR or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.00 million kg against 873,791 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure left on pasture between China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea?
130,749 kg, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for all animals — manure left on pasture?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 175th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: All Animals — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/equatorial-guinea/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: All Animals — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).