Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … capita

Mauritius
1.24 kg per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.18 kg per person
in 2023
Mauritius rank
136th
Zimbabwe rank
138th

All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … capita over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 1.24 kg per person against 1.18 kg per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.06 kg per person.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mauritius ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.276 kg per person 2.13 kg per person 1.85 kg per person Zimbabwe
1970s 0.2827 kg per person 2.37 kg per person 2.09 kg per person Zimbabwe
1980s 0.4067 kg per person 1.67 kg per person 1.26 kg per person Zimbabwe
1990s 0.6581 kg per person 1.42 kg per person 0.7635 kg per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.8422 kg per person 1.31 kg per person 0.472 kg per person Zimbabwe
2010s 1.11 kg per person 1.2 kg per person 0.089 kg per person Zimbabwe
2020s 1.22 kg per person 1.13 kg per person 0.0877 kg per person Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Mauritius, at 1.24 kg per person against 1.18 kg per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0.06 kg per person, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per?
Mauritius ranks 136th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.