China vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square

China
692.1 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
717.96 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
41st
Sao Tome and Principe rank
40th

All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … square over time

  • China
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 717.96 kg per square kilometre against 692.1 kg per square kilometre in China, a difference of 25.86 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China ahead.

China ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th of 170 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 6 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 241.23 kg per square kilometre 84.15 kg per square kilometre 157.08 kg per square kilometre China
1970s 322.47 kg per square kilometre 68.6 kg per square kilometre 253.87 kg per square kilometre China
1980s 391.8 kg per square kilometre 56.28 kg per square kilometre 335.52 kg per square kilometre China
1990s 555.53 kg per square kilometre 66.44 kg per square kilometre 489.09 kg per square kilometre China
2000s 640.46 kg per square kilometre 226.64 kg per square kilometre 413.82 kg per square kilometre China
2010s 634.28 kg per square kilometre 560.76 kg per square kilometre 73.52 kg per square kilometre China
2020s 674.06 kg per square kilometre 680.27 kg per square kilometre 6.21 kg per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per, China or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 717.96 kg per square kilometre against 692.1 kg per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per between China and Sao Tome and Principe?
25.86 kg per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per?
China ranks 41st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 40th of 170 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/china/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/china/sao-tome-and-principe/">China vs Sao Tome and Principe: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
172 places, 9,878 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.