Australia vs Congo: All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit

Australia
0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Congo
0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Australia rank
134th
Congo rank
136th

All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
00.0020.0040.0060.008196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Congo, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 134th and Congo ranks 136th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Congo in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0069 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0024 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0045 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1970s 0.0032 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0013 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0018 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1980s 0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1990s 0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
2000s 0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
2020s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit, Australia or Congo?
Australia, at 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit between Australia and Congo?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit?
Australia ranks 134th and Congo ranks 136th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,202 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.