Central African Republic vs Myanmar: All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit

Central African Republic
0.0094 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Myanmar
0.0052 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
3rd
Myanmar rank
6th

All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Myanmar
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.0094 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0052 kg per US$ of GDP in Myanmar, a difference of 0.0042 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.8 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 3rd and Myanmar ranks 6th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Myanmar in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.01 kg per US$ of GDP 0.3486 kg per US$ of GDP 0.3386 kg per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1970s 0.0097 kg per US$ of GDP 0.2506 kg per US$ of GDP 0.2409 kg per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1980s 0.0091 kg per US$ of GDP 0.1915 kg per US$ of GDP 0.1823 kg per US$ of GDP Myanmar
1990s 0.0113 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0763 kg per US$ of GDP 0.065 kg per US$ of GDP Myanmar
2000s 0.0135 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0308 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0173 kg per US$ of GDP Myanmar
2010s 0.0113 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0083 kg per US$ of GDP 0.003 kg per US$ of GDP Central African Republic
2020s 0.0098 kg per US$ of GDP 0.005 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0048 kg per US$ of GDP Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit, Central African Republic or Myanmar?
Central African Republic, at 0.0094 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0052 kg per US$ of GDP in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit between Central African Republic and Myanmar?
0.0042 kg per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Myanmar rank globally for all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit?
Central African Republic ranks 3rd and Myanmar ranks 6th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Myanmar: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/myanmar/">Central African Republic vs Myanmar: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 9,202 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.