How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea vs Serbia: All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit

Guinea

0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Serbia

0.001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Guinea rank

52nd

Serbia rank

49th

All Animals: Manure management (manure treated, N content) … unit over time

Guinea
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 0.001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP in Guinea, a difference of 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 52nd and Serbia ranks 49th of 169 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0027 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP	Serbia
2010s	0.0016 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0022 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0006 kg per US$ of GDP	Serbia
2020s	0.0011 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0014 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit, Guinea or Serbia?: Serbia, at 0.001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0.0009 kg per US$ of GDP in Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit between Guinea and Serbia?: 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Guinea and Serbia rank globally for all animals — manure management (manure treated, n content), per unit?: Guinea ranks 52nd and Serbia ranks 49th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Serbia: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/guinea/serbia/">Guinea vs Serbia: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 171 places, 9,202 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 06 October 2026

All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.