Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: All Animals — Manure management

Australia and New Zealand
384.31 million kg
in 2023
Viet Nam
416.97 million kg
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
19th
Viet Nam rank
3rd

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Viet Nam
100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 416.97 million kg against 384.31 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 32.65 million kg.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 19th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 6 and Viet Nam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1960s 254.13 million kg 133.61 million kg 120.52 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1970s 322.22 million kg 134.09 million kg 188.13 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1980s 289.39 million kg 172.30 million kg 117.09 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1990s 323.07 million kg 234.47 million kg 88.60 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2000s 364.08 million kg 332.23 million kg 31.85 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2010s 374.08 million kg 365.94 million kg 8.15 million kg Australia and New Zealand
2020s 363.88 million kg 406.78 million kg 42.90 million kg Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Australia and New Zealand or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 416.97 million kg against 384.31 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam?
32.65 million kg, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Viet Nam rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 19th and Viet Nam ranks 3rd of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/viet-nam-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Viet Nam: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).