Barbados vs Botswana: All Animals — Manure management

Barbados
1.74 million kg
in 2023
Botswana
1.47 million kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
170th
Botswana rank
173rd

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Barbados
  • Botswana
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 1.74 million kg against 1.47 million kg in Botswana, a difference of 262,860 kg.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Barbados ranks 170th and Botswana ranks 173rd of 211 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Botswana Difference Ahead
1960s 656,981 kg 2.41 million kg 1.75 million kg Botswana
1970s 978,195 kg 3.60 million kg 2.62 million kg Botswana
1980s 1.38 million kg 4.24 million kg 2.86 million kg Botswana
1990s 1.36 million kg 3.11 million kg 1.75 million kg Botswana
2000s 1.28 million kg 2.83 million kg 1.55 million kg Botswana
2010s 1.52 million kg 2.19 million kg 671,859 kg Botswana
2020s 1.71 million kg 1.48 million kg 238,902 kg Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Barbados or Botswana?
Barbados, at 1.74 million kg against 1.47 million kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Barbados and Botswana?
262,860 kg, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Botswana?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Botswana rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Barbados ranks 170th and Botswana ranks 173rd of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Botswana: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/barbados/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/barbados/botswana/">Barbados vs Botswana: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).