Barbados vs Eswatini: All Animals — Manure management

Barbados
1.74 million kg
in 2023
Eswatini
2.04 million kg
in 2023
Barbados rank
170th
Eswatini rank
167th

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Barbados
  • Eswatini
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 2.04 million kg against 1.74 million kg in Barbados, a difference of 299,320 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Barbados's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 170th and Eswatini ranks 167th of 211 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 656,981 kg 1.30 million kg 642,313 kg Eswatini
1970s 978,195 kg 1.54 million kg 565,447 kg Eswatini
1980s 1.38 million kg 1.72 million kg 343,415 kg Eswatini
1990s 1.36 million kg 1.89 million kg 525,972 kg Eswatini
2000s 1.28 million kg 1.91 million kg 633,040 kg Eswatini
2010s 1.52 million kg 2.02 million kg 498,555 kg Eswatini
2020s 1.71 million kg 2.09 million kg 376,270 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Barbados or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 2.04 million kg against 1.74 million kg in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Barbados and Eswatini?
299,320 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Eswatini rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Barbados ranks 170th and Eswatini ranks 167th of 211 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Eswatini: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/barbados/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/barbados/eswatini/">Barbados vs Eswatini: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).