Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Czechoslovakia: All Animals — Manure management

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
113.24 million kg
in 2023
Czechoslovakia
308.68 million kg
in 1992
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
8th
Czechoslovakia rank
25th

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Czechoslovakia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M196119922023

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 308.68 million kg against 113.24 million kg in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 195.44 million kg.

That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 2.7 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 8th and Czechoslovakia ranks 25th of 20 regions.

Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Czechoslovakia Difference Ahead
1960s 15.00 million kg 297.32 million kg 282.32 million kg Czechoslovakia
1970s 25.03 million kg 314.34 million kg 289.31 million kg Czechoslovakia
1980s 36.69 million kg 349.05 million kg 312.36 million kg Czechoslovakia
1990s 32.34 million kg 334.17 million kg 301.84 million kg Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Czechoslovakia?
Czechoslovakia, at 308.68 million kg against 113.24 million kg in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 1992.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Czechoslovakia?
195.44 million kg, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Czechoslovakia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Czechoslovakia rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 8th and Czechoslovakia ranks 25th of 20 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Czechoslovakia: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/czechoslovakia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/czechoslovakia/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Czechoslovakia: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).