Botswana vs China, Hong Kong SAR: All Animals — Manure management

Botswana
1.47 million kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
1.47 million kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
160th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
161st

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Botswana
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 1.47 million kg against 1.47 million kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 7,620 kg.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 160th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 161st of 195 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 2.41 million kg 2.29 million kg 120,231 kg Botswana
1970s 3.60 million kg 3.44 million kg 159,387 kg Botswana
1980s 4.24 million kg 3.56 million kg 673,742 kg Botswana
1990s 3.11 million kg 1.66 million kg 1.45 million kg Botswana
2000s 2.83 million kg 1.15 million kg 1.68 million kg Botswana
2010s 2.19 million kg 1.26 million kg 929,197 kg Botswana
2020s 1.48 million kg 1.47 million kg 9,390 kg Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Botswana or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Botswana, at 1.47 million kg against 1.47 million kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Botswana and China, Hong Kong SAR?
7,620 kg, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and China, Hong Kong SAR?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Botswana ranks 160th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 161st of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs China, Hong Kong SAR: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/botswana/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/botswana/china-hong-kong-sar/">Botswana vs China, Hong Kong SAR: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).