Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Italy: All Animals — Manure management

Democratic Republic of the Congo
19.55 million kg
in 2023
Italy
432.57 million kg
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
15th
Italy rank
17th

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Italy
0200.0M400.0M600.0M196119922023

How they compare

Italy currently reports 432.57 million kg against 19.55 million kg in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 413.02 million kg.

That makes Italy's figure about 22.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 15th and Italy ranks 17th of 20 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Italy Difference Ahead
1960s 9.41 million kg 627.72 million kg 618.31 million kg Italy
1970s 12.58 million kg 653.56 million kg 640.97 million kg Italy
1980s 15.07 million kg 676.79 million kg 661.72 million kg Italy
1990s 20.92 million kg 589.05 million kg 568.13 million kg Italy
2000s 18.13 million kg 524.13 million kg 506.00 million kg Italy
2010s 18.54 million kg 499.09 million kg 480.55 million kg Italy
2020s 19.24 million kg 456.83 million kg 437.59 million kg Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Italy?
Italy, at 432.57 million kg against 19.55 million kg in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Italy?
413.02 million kg, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Italy?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Italy rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 15th and Italy ranks 17th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Italy: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/italy/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Italy: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).