Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management

Melanesia
34.00 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
100.34 million kg
in 2023
Melanesia rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 100.34 million kg against 34.00 million kg in Melanesia, a difference of 66.34 million kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.0 times Melanesia's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Melanesia ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 11.27 million kg 20.80 million kg 9.53 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 14.87 million kg 25.52 million kg 10.65 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 18.54 million kg 32.33 million kg 13.79 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 24.48 million kg 40.01 million kg 15.53 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 30.73 million kg 56.09 million kg 25.36 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 32.85 million kg 74.77 million kg 41.92 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 33.09 million kg 95.59 million kg 62.50 million kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 100.34 million kg against 34.00 million kg in Melanesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
66.34 million kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Melanesia ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).