Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management

Pakistan
1.23 billion kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
100.34 million kg
in 2023
Pakistan rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Pakistan
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 1.23 billion kg against 100.34 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 1.13 billion kg.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 12.3 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.

Pakistan ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 195 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 173.49 million kg 20.80 million kg 152.70 million kg Pakistan
1970s 221.62 million kg 25.52 million kg 196.10 million kg Pakistan
1980s 296.05 million kg 32.33 million kg 263.72 million kg Pakistan
1990s 421.15 million kg 40.01 million kg 381.14 million kg Pakistan
2000s 566.71 million kg 56.09 million kg 510.62 million kg Pakistan
2010s 847.26 million kg 74.77 million kg 772.48 million kg Pakistan
2020s 1.15 billion kg 95.59 million kg 1.05 billion kg Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Pakistan or United Republic of Tanzania?
Pakistan, at 1.23 billion kg against 100.34 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.13 billion kg, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Pakistan ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/pakistan/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/pakistan/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).