Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management

Republic of Moldova
30.38 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
100.34 million kg
in 2023
Republic of Moldova rank
13th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Republic of Moldova
  • United Republic of Tanzania
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 100.34 million kg against 30.38 million kg in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 69.96 million kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 3.3 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Republic of Moldova ranks 13th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Republic of Moldova United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 56.73 million kg 40.77 million kg 15.96 million kg Republic of Moldova
2000s 33.58 million kg 56.09 million kg 22.51 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 31.37 million kg 74.77 million kg 43.41 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 29.47 million kg 95.59 million kg 66.13 million kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Republic of Moldova or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 100.34 million kg against 30.38 million kg in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
69.96 million kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Republic of Moldova and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Republic of Moldova ranks 13th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/republic-of-moldova/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Republic of Moldova vs United Republic of Tanzania: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).