Russian Federation vs Western Europe: All Animals — Manure management

Russian Federation
1.48 billion kg
in 2023
Western Europe
2.70 billion kg
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
7th
Western Europe rank
16th

All Animals — Manure management over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Western Europe
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B196119922023

How they compare

Western Europe currently reports 2.70 billion kg against 1.48 billion kg in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.22 billion kg.

That makes Western Europe's figure about 1.8 times Russian Federation's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Western Europe has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 7th and Western Europe ranks 16th of 195 countries.

Western Europe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Western Europe Difference Ahead
1990s 2.62 billion kg 3.42 billion kg 805.67 million kg Western Europe
2000s 1.59 billion kg 3.16 billion kg 1.57 billion kg Western Europe
2010s 1.47 billion kg 3.04 billion kg 1.58 billion kg Western Europe
2020s 1.47 billion kg 2.75 billion kg 1.28 billion kg Western Europe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all animals — manure management, Russian Federation or Western Europe?
Western Europe, at 2.70 billion kg against 1.48 billion kg in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in all animals — manure management between Russian Federation and Western Europe?
1.22 billion kg, with Western Europe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Western Europe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and Western Europe rank globally for all animals — manure management?
Russian Federation ranks 7th and Western Europe ranks 16th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Western Europe: All Animals — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/russian-federation-2/western-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/all-animals-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/russian-federation-2/western-europe/">Russian Federation vs Western Europe: All Animals — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All Animals — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
248 places, 14,264 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).