Bermuda vs Pakistan: Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use

Bermuda
1 t
in 2021
Pakistan
0 t
in 2023
Bermuda rank
11th
Pakistan rank
12th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use over time

  • Bermuda
  • Pakistan
0246810201220172023

How they compare

Bermuda currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Pakistan, a difference of 1 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Bermuda ahead.

Bermuda ranks 11th and Pakistan ranks 12th of 33 countries.

Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Pakistan Difference Ahead
2010s 2.14 t 0 t 2.14 t Bermuda
2020s 1 t 0 t 1 t Bermuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use, Bermuda or Pakistan?
Bermuda, at 1 t against 0 t in Pakistan as of 2021.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use between Bermuda and Pakistan?
1 t, with Bermuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Pakistan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
How do Bermuda and Pakistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use?
Bermuda ranks 11th and Pakistan ranks 12th of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
34 places, 299 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf