Cyprus vs Slovenia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use

Cyprus
5 t
in 2024
Slovenia
0 t
in 2024
Cyprus rank
10th
Slovenia rank
12th

Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use over time

  • Cyprus
  • Slovenia
051015201220182024

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 5 t against 0 t in Slovenia, a difference of 5 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Slovenia ahead.

Cyprus ranks 10th and Slovenia ranks 12th of 33 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Slovenia Difference Ahead
2010s 2.62 t 0 t 2.62 t Cyprus
2020s 6.8 t 0 t 6.8 t Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use, Cyprus or Slovenia?
Cyprus, at 5 t against 0 t in Slovenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use between Cyprus and Slovenia?
5 t, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Slovenia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
How do Cyprus and Slovenia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use?
Cyprus ranks 10th and Slovenia ranks 12th of 33 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
34 places, 299 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf