Ecuador vs Iceland: Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use
Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Iceland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 198 t against 48 t in Iceland, a difference of 150 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 4.1 times Iceland's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 6th and Iceland ranks 7th of 33 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 439.2 t | 78.8 t | 360.4 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 187.75 t | 54.5 t | 133.25 t | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use, Ecuador or Iceland?
- Ecuador, at 198 t against 48 t in Iceland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use between Ecuador and Iceland?
- 150 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Iceland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Iceland rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 6th and Iceland ranks 7th of 33 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf