Iceland vs Republic of Moldova: Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use
Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use over time
- Iceland
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 811 t against 48 t in Iceland, a difference of 763 t.
That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 16.9 times Iceland's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 6th and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 29 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 78.8 t | 373 t | 294.2 t | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 64 t | 624.5 t | 560.5 t | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use, Iceland or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 811 t against 48 t in Iceland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use between Iceland and Republic of Moldova?
- 763 t, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Republic of Moldova?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2021.
- How do Iceland and Republic of Moldova rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use?
- Iceland ranks 6th and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf