Mexico vs Republic of Moldova: Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use
Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use over time
- Mexico
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 628,105 t against 811 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 627,294 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 774.5 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 1st and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 29 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 677,436 t | 347 t | 677,089 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 777,695 t | 624.5 t | 777,070 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use, Mexico or Republic of Moldova?
- Mexico, at 628,105 t against 811 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use between Mexico and Republic of Moldova?
- 627,294 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Republic of Moldova?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2021.
- How do Mexico and Republic of Moldova rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — agricultural use?
- Mexico ranks 1st and Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf