Brazil vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity over time
- Brazil
- China, Hong Kong SAR
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 240 t against 129.55 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 110.45 t.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.9 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 52nd and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 53rd of 103 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | China, Hong Kong SAR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12,699 t | 13.49 t | 12,686 t | Brazil |
| 2010s | 42,523 t | 315.37 t | 42,208 t | Brazil |
| 2020s | 39,508 t | 146.77 t | 39,361 t | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity, Brazil or China, Hong Kong SAR?
- Brazil, at 240 t against 129.55 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity between Brazil and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 110.45 t, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and China, Hong Kong SAR?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity?
- Brazil ranks 52nd and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 53rd of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf