China, Hong Kong SAR vs Mexico: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 336.83 t against 129.55 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 207.28 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 2.6 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 53rd and Mexico ranks 50th of 103 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.57 t | 71,471 t | 71,454 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 301.73 t | 27,858 t | 27,557 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 84.17 t | 18,363 t | 18,279 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 336.83 t against 129.55 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Mexico?
- 207.28 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Mexico?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Mexico rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 53rd and Mexico ranks 50th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf