El Salvador vs Georgia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity over time
- El Salvador
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 85.43 t against 59 t in El Salvador, a difference of 26.43 t.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.4 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was El Salvador ahead.
El Salvador ranks 59th and Georgia ranks 57th of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 372.9 t | 1,229 t | 855.84 t | Georgia |
| 2010s | 261 t | 254.05 t | 6.95 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 103.8 t | 79.72 t | 24.08 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity, El Salvador or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 85.43 t against 59 t in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity between El Salvador and Georgia?
- 26.43 t, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity?
- El Salvador ranks 59th and Georgia ranks 57th of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf