El Salvador vs Singapore: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity over time
- El Salvador
- Singapore
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 59 t against 52.48 t in Singapore, a difference of 6.52 t.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
El Salvador ranks 59th and Singapore ranks 61st of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 385.2 t | 399.61 t | 14.42 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 261 t | 87.92 t | 173.08 t | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 103.8 t | 32 t | 71.8 t | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity, El Salvador or Singapore?
- El Salvador, at 59 t against 52.48 t in Singapore as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity between El Salvador and Singapore?
- 6.52 t, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Singapore?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Singapore rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity?
- El Salvador ranks 59th and Singapore ranks 61st of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf