European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) vs Libya: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity over time
- European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade)
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 425,851 t against 219,997 t in European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade), a difference of 205,854 t.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.9 times European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade)'s.
Across all 7 years both countries report, European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) has been ahead every year.
European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) ranks 14th and Libya ranks 12th of 31 groups.
European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity, European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) or Libya?
- Libya, at 425,851 t against 219,997 t in European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity between European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) and Libya?
- 205,854 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) and Libya?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) and Libya rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity?
- European Union (28) (excluding intra-trade) ranks 14th and Libya ranks 12th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf