Kazakhstan vs Singapore: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity over time
- Kazakhstan
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 52.48 t against 34.92 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 17.56 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.5 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 62nd and Singapore ranks 61st of 103 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 191.6 t | 95.95 t | 95.65 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 1,929 t | 534.73 t | 1,394 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 978.55 t | 31.8 t | 946.75 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity, Kazakhstan or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 52.48 t against 34.92 t in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity between Kazakhstan and Singapore?
- 17.56 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Singapore?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Singapore rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity?
- Kazakhstan ranks 62nd and Singapore ranks 61st of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf