Lithuania vs Uzbekistan: Ammonia, anhydrous β Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous β Export quantity over time
- Lithuania
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 371.87 t against 311 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 60.87 t.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Lithuania ranks 49th and Uzbekistan ranks 51st of 103 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22,150 t | 9,680 t | 12,470 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 3,833 t | 15,989 t | 12,156 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 698.36 t | 1,312 t | 614.08 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous β export quantity, Lithuania or Uzbekistan?
- Lithuania, at 371.87 t against 311 t in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous β export quantity between Lithuania and Uzbekistan?
- 60.87 t, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uzbekistan?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Uzbekistan rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous β export quantity?
- Lithuania ranks 49th and Uzbekistan ranks 51st of 103 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous β Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf