Namibia vs North Macedonia: Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity
Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity over time
- Namibia
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 2.48 t against 1.04 t in Namibia, a difference of 1.44 t.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 2.4 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Namibia ranks 82nd and North Macedonia ranks 79th of 97 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.65 t | 1.26 t | 16.39 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1.76 t | 6.62 t | 4.86 t | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity, Namibia or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 2.48 t against 1.04 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity between Namibia and North Macedonia?
- 1.44 t, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and North Macedonia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Namibia and North Macedonia rank globally for ammonia, anhydrous — export quantity?
- Namibia ranks 82nd and North Macedonia ranks 79th of 97 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Ammonia, anhydrous — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf